AXIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE TRANSFORMATION CONCEPT IN THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2020.1.05Keywords:
cognitive linguistics, concept, axiological features of the concept, positive/negative evaluation of speaker, TRANSFORMATIONAbstract
The axiological features of the TRANSFORMATION concept are identified and analyzed in the article. The identification of these features was based on contextual analysis. Axiological features are elements of meaning that represent the positive / negative attitude of the speaker to the conceptualized phenomenon as a whole or to its separate conceptual features, such as 1) immoral - moral, pretended - real; 2) backward - progressive, irrelevant - relevant, unpopular - popular; 3) evil - kind, aggressive - peaceful, dangerous - safe; 4) disharmonious - harmonious; 5) nasty - pleasant, hated - beloved; 6) traditional - innovative; 7) sick - healthy.
The results of the research show that conceptual features with a positive evaluation usually do not have certain means of linguistic expression, most often their implementation is carried out in context. Semantic concordance of the nominates of the TRANSFORMATION concept with the words bad, evil, harmful, unattractive, aggressive, sick, disharmonious, etc. can be the means of expressing the speaker's negative attitude to the described phenomenon of transformation. The obtained results indicate the predominance of a negative evaluation over a positive one. Features that express a negative evaluation are more diverse. They are presented in the denotative meaning of a number of lexical units, which indicates their importance in the objectification of the TRANSFORMATION concept. On the other hand, a positive evaluation of the described facts and phenomena is not always recorded. Axiological features of the concept belong to the peripheral zone of the field, or the interpretive field of the concept.
References
Boldyrev, N. N. (2009). Yazykovaia reprezentatsiia osnovnykh urovnei poznaniia. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2, 7-16 [in Russian].
Volf Ye. M. (1980) Funktsionalnaia semantika otsenki. Moskva: Nauka [In Russian].
Zvonko, H. (2014). Motyvatsiini oznaky kontseptu PERETVORENNIA v ukrainskii movi. Ukrainske movoznavstvo (Mizhvidomchyi naukovyi zbirnyk) (Issue 44/1), (pp. 118-123). Kyiv: VPTS «Kyivskyi universytet» [in Ukrainian].
Zvonko, H. О. (2014). Obiektyvatsiia poniattievykh oznak kontseptu PERETVORENNIA v ukrainskii movi. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia «Filolohichna»: zbirnyk naukovykh prats / ukl.: I. V. Kovalchuk, L. M. Kotsiuk, S. V. Novoseletska (Issue 44), (pp. 100-103). Ostroh: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia» [in Ukrainian].
Issers, O. S. (2002). Kommunikativnyie strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi. 2nd issue. Moskva: Editorial URSS [in Russian].
Karasik, V. I. (2004). Yazykovoi krug: lichnost. kontsepty. diskurs. Moskva: Gnozis [in Russian].
Karaulov, Yu. N. (1989). Predisloviie. Russkaia yazykovaia lichnost i zadachi eie izucheniia. Yazyk i lichnost. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].
Krasnykh, V. V. (2003). «Svoi» sredi «chuzhikh»: mif ili realnost? Moskva: Gnozis [in Russian].
Kosmeda T. A. (2000) Aksiolohichni aspekty pragmalinhvistyky: formuvannia i rozvytok katehorii otsinky. Lviv: LNU im. I. Franka [in Ukrainian].
Lakoff, George (2008). Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. A. N. Baranov (transl. from English & ed.). 2nd issue. Moskva: Izd-vo LKI [in Russian].
Pryhodko A.M. (2008). Kontsepty i kontseprosystemy v kognityvno-dyskursyvnii paradyhmi linhvistyky. Zaporizhzhia: Premier [in Ukrainian].
Etnosemiometriia tsennostnykh smyslov: kollektivnaia monografiia. (2008). Irkutsk: IGLU [in Russian].
Yazyk i kultura: Fakty i tsennosti: k 70-letiiu Yuriia Sergeievicha Stepanova. (2001). E. S. Kubriakova. T. E. Yatsko (ed.). Moskva: Yazyki russkoi kultury [in Russian].
Culture Matters: how values shape human progress. (2000). L. E. Harrison, S. P. Huntington (ed.). N.Y. : Basic Books [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Linguistic and Conceptual Worldviews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














