ETHNIC AND CULTURAL NATURE OF HISTORICAL - TERMINOLOGY: THE COMPARATIVE AND TRANSLATION ASPECTS (based on historical terms of antiquity and Old Rus period)

Authors

  • Liudmyla SLAVOVA Dr. habil., Prof. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8035-1801
  • Maryna VOZNA PhD., Associate Professor Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2022.1.10

Keywords:

Old Rus period, historical terminology, culture-specific terms, equivalent, combined renomination, descriptive translation, analogous translation

Abstract

The article looks into the comparative and translational aspects of histori­cal terms as a group of special professional words used by historians in both English and Ukrainian academic texts to describe one particular period in Ukrainian history, that of antiquity and Old Rus. Different groups of historical terminology were identified in original Ukrainian and English texts on this period, such as proper names, names to denote items of material culture, so­cial and military status, rank at the royal court, social and religious processes and phenomena. Particular attention was given to those names that denote culture- and period-specific concepts of the described time-period in Ukraini­an history. English translations of Ukrainian historical terminology were stu­died based on non-numerous existing translations from Ukrainian, which were then compared to the approaches used by native English-speaking academics. For those concepts where no equivalents could be found, the authors have offered their own translations. Conclusions were made about the prevailing methods of rendering different classes of historical terms into English, inclu­ding culture-specific terms which were found in each terminological group. Such culture-specific Ukrainian terminology is rendered into English predom­inantly via combined renomination, which combines phonological and/or or­thographic adaptation and description or via description only. Other methods have been discussed, such as translation by equivalent, loan translation and analogous translation, which were applied to both non-culture specific and culture-specific terminology. Identifying a lexical unit as belonging to one of those groups helps with determining its translation method. Conclusions have been drawn about the general nature of historical terminology, which from the translation point of view can be divided into two big groups: terms denoting universal historical notions and culture-specific historical terms.

References

Zorivchak, R.P. (1989). Realiya i Pereklad. Lviv: vydavnytstvo Lvivskoho Universitetu.

Zubko, A. (2000). Ukrayinska onomastyka: zdobutky ta problem. URL.:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/32501/19- zubko.pdf.

Kiyak T.R., Ohuy O.D., Naumenko A.M. (2006). Teoriya ta prakyka perekladu (nimetska mova). Vinnytsya: Nova Knyha.

Kovalenko, O.V. (2011). Ispolzovaniye istorizmov v romanakh V. Skotta. Naukovy Visnyk Volynskoho Nationalnoho Universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky. Filolohichni Nauky. Movoznavstvo, 5. P. 60-64.

Kovalenko, O.V. (2002). Stilisticheskiye Funktsiyi Zhanrovo- Markirovannoy Leksiki Istoricheskikh Romanov V. Skotta. Mova i kultura, 2, 4/1. P. 137-143.

Kocherhan, M.P. (2005). Vstup do movoznavsyva. Kyiv: Akademiya.

Lazarev, O. (2016). Problema vidtvorenniia ukrayinskoyi istorychnoyi terminolohiyi u frantsuzkomu teksti. Aktualni problemy filolohiyi ta perekla- doznavstva, 10. P. 90-92.

Panko, T.I., Kochan I. M., Matsuyk H.P. (1994). Ukrayinske termi- noznavstvo. Lviv: Svit.

Slyvka, M.I. (2008). Funktsionalno-kohnytyvni vidpovidnyky

ukrayinskykh istoryko-kulturnykh realiy v anhlomovnukh vydannyakh. Avtoref. kand.dyssert. Kyiv.

Tomilenko, L. (2013). Istoryzmy i istorichni terminy: do problemy rozmezhoovannya. Naukovi Zapysky Vinnytskoho Univesytetu imeni Mykhai- la Kotsyubynskoho. Filolohiya. Movoznavstvo, 17. P. 132-137. URL.: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nzvdpu_filol_2013_17_28

Torchinsky, M.M. (2009). Struktura Onimnoho Prostory Ukrayinskoyi Movy. Funktsionuvannia vlasnukh nazv. Khmelnytsky: Vydavnytstvo Khmel- nytskoho Universitetu.

Ukrayinska mova. Entsiklopediya (2000). Kyiv: Ukrayinska Entsi- klopediya imeni M.P. Bazhana.

SOURCES

Davies, N. (2000). Yevropa. Istoriya. Per. z angl. Kyiv.

Kazakevich, H.M. (2006). Kelty: traditsiyna kultura ta sotsialni insty- tuty. Kyiv: Fitosotsiotsentr.

Kotlyar M.F., Rychka B.M. (2008). Knyazhiy Dvir Pivdennoyi Russi X-XIII st. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.

Davies, N. (1997). Europe. A History. Pimlico.

Hrushevsky M. (1997). History of Ukraine-Rus'. Volume 1: From Pre-history to the Eleventh Century. Alberta: University of Alberta Press.

Kubiiovych V., Struk D. (1984). Encyclopedia of Ukraine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Nahaylo, B. (1999). The Ukrainian Resurgence. London: Hurst & Company.

Wilson, A. (2002). The Ukrainians. Unexpected Nation. USA: Yale University Press.

Published

2022-05-25

How to Cite

SLAVOVA, L., & VOZNA, M. (2022). ETHNIC AND CULTURAL NATURE OF HISTORICAL - TERMINOLOGY: THE COMPARATIVE AND TRANSLATION ASPECTS (based on historical terms of antiquity and Old Rus period). Linguistic and Conceptual Worldviews, 1(71), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2022.1.10