ECOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF GERMAN-LANGUAGE MEDIA SPACE

Authors

  • Iryna PIANKOVSKA PhD., Associate Professor Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2022.2.08

Keywords:

media linguistics, media ecology, German media space, linguis¬tic analysis, isolating influence of mass media

Abstract

The article covers the concepts of media linguistics and media ecology as the leading areas of modern media studies, their terminology and issues. Different approaches to the definition of media ecology are given and its role and tasks in different spheres of life are indicated. The scientific achievements of some Ukrainian and German linguists and media experts in the field of studying the German media space are analyzed in order to find ways of positive influence of mass media on society, in particular the influence of media ecology on media competence, cultural and ethical norms, communication between all members of society. The importance of studying the strategies and tactics of the influence of the media on the consolidation and isolation processes in society is emphasized. In addition, the article provides a linguistic analysis of the coverage of one of the most pressing global problems of today - coronavirus vaccination - in the Ger­man media source "ZEIT ONLINE" in order to establish its impact on the life of German society. In particular, the most commonly used lexical items and phrases are identified, which reflect the main topics of this problem, namely: compulsory vaccination, attitude of citizens to vaccination, dismissal of unvac­cinated citizens from work or even dismissal, vaccination of children, govern­ment measures to prevent coronavirus and more. It is established that the co­verage of the problem of vaccination in the German media is a clear example of the isolating impact of the media on society, as this issue is debatable and causes a lot of controversy during the discussion. In conclusion, it is noted that the use of appropriate means, in particular linguistic, in the media can significantly affect social processes, both isolation and consolidation. Possession of strategies and tactics of influence is crucial for the formation of public opinion on the global problems of mankind and the direction of its life.

References

Bernatskaja A.A. O triokh aspektakh ekologii jazyka. Vestnik Kras- nojarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta: gumanitarnyje nauki. № 4. Kras- nojarsk, 2003. S. 122-124.

Baacke D. Sander U. Vollbrecht R. Medienwelten Jugendlicher. einbandige Sonderausgabe der beiden Bande Lebenswelten Jugendlicher 1 + 2. Sonderausg. Opladen: Leske+Budrich; 1991.

BuhlerB. Virtuelle Okologie. Handbuch Virtualitat. Hrsg. Kasprowicz D., Rieger S. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Verlag, 2020. S. 149-164.

Fill A. Sprachokologie und Okolinguistik. Tubingen: Stauffenburg, 1996. 300 S.

Finke P. Transdisciplinary Linguistics: Ecolinguistics as a Pacemaker into a New Scientific Age. Fill A./Penz H. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, London/ New York, 2018. S. 406-419.

Ganguin S. Medienokologie. Horn K.P., Kemnitz H., Marotzki W., Sandfuchs U. (Hrsg.) Klinkhardt Lexikon Erziehungswissenschaft. Band 1. Bad Heilbrunn: Julius Klinkhandt Verlag, 2012. S. 362.

Haugen E. The Ecology of Languages, in: Dil A.S. (Hg.), The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen, Standford, 1972. S. 325-339.

Hoffmann D. Mikos L. Mediensozialisationstheorien. Modelle und Ansatze in der Diskussion. Wiesbaden: Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 2010. 248 S.

Innis H. The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1951.

Luscher K. Wehrspaun M. Medienokologie: Der Anteil der Medien an unserer Gestaltung der Lebenswelten Zeitschrift fur Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie: (ZSE),1985. S. 187-204.

McLuhan H.M. Report on Project in Understanding New Media, 1960. Режим доступу: https://mcluhangalaxy.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/report-on- project-in1understanding-new-media-1960-available-online/

Ong W.J. Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology. Ithaca: Cornell Univer-sity Press, 1971.

Postman N. The Humanism of Media Ecology. Proceedings of the Me-dia Ecology Association, Volume 1, 2000. P. 10-16.

Rieger S. Die Individualitat der Medien. Eine Geschichte der Wissen- schaften vom Menschen, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp 2001.

Rothe K. Medienokologie - Zu einer Ethik des Mediengebrauchs. Zeitschrift fur Medienwissenschaft. Schwerpunkt: Medienokologien. 2016, 14 (1), S. 46-57.

Schicha Ch. Brosda C. (Hrsg.) Handbuch Medienethik. Wiesbaden: Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 2010. 580 S.

Stibbe A. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. London: Routledge. 2015. 260 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780367855512

Trampe W. Okologische Linguistik und Humanokologie. Fill A., Penz H., Trampe W. (Eds.) Colourful Green Ideas. Bern: Peter Lang, 2002. P. 89-101.

Zacharias W. Kulturell-asthetische Medienbildung 2.0. Aspekte asthe- tischen Lernens in einer technisch-medialen Zeit. Wiesbaden: Springer Fach- medien Verlag, 2010.

Zacharias W. Interaktiv - Medienokologie zwischen Sinnenreich und Cyberspace. Munchen: KoPad-Verlag, 2000.

Published

2022-08-29

How to Cite

PIANKOVSKA, I. (2022). ECOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF GERMAN-LANGUAGE MEDIA SPACE. Linguistic and Conceptual Worldviews, 2(72), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2022.2.08