MULTISENSORY EXHIBITING IN MODERN MUSEUM DISCOURSE (BASED ON NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUMS’ EXHIBITIONS IN LONDON, OXFORD, CAMBRIDGE)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2025.2.08

Keywords:

discourse, multimodal, multisensory, museum, participatory museum, tactile, text-image relationship

Abstract

The article highlights multimodal exhibiting at Natural History Museums in London, Oxford and Cambridge that position themselves as important platforms for public education and scholarly dialogue on critical environmental issues. These multisensory exhibition strategies and discourse align with contemporary educational theories, emphasise experiential learning, critical thinking, visitors’ engagement and their personalised experience. By immersing visitors in sensory-rich environments that replicate real-world phenomena, museums facilitate meaningful connections between visitors and the natural world developing the concept of a participatory museum. By integrating visual art, visual aids, informative texts, soundscapes, high-fidelity audio, tactile experiences, interactive displays, panels, models, immersive exhibits, interactive technology, interactive touch-screen installations, interactive puzzle games, permanent and temporary exhibitions create a more inclusive and dynamic learning environment that accommodates different learning preferences. Tactile modality is effectively incorporated into a range of interactive experiences within Natural History museums exhibitions offering visitors a more informative, immersive and interactive way to connect with exhibits. The blend of physical interaction and descriptive content allows for a more immersive understanding of nature, fauna and flora, transforming a static display into a more dynamic, interactive learning experience. Sensory invitations, linguistic directives, textual instructions assist visitors in both visually and cognitively interpreting the intended action, enhance physical interaction with the displays. When further interaction with the exhibit is required, action verbs are accompanied by symbolic imagery to reinforce meaning. This integration of language and imagery creates a layered, multimodal communication system that engages visitors not only cognitively but also sensorily. By combining textual instructions with visual representation, via text-image relationship, the exhibits offer an interactive learning experience that appeals to various sensory modalities and learning preferences, making complex information more accessible and memorable.

References

Barber, N., & QudeebAl-Ban, A. Z. (2023). SPARKLAB: Children’s Science Museum [Thesis]. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10330.52165

de Carvalho Souza, A. M., et al. (2023). DinosaurVR: Using virtual reality to enhance a museum exhibition. Journal on Interactive Systems, 14 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2023.3464

Decroupet, S. (2024). Translating environmental memory in a natural history museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 39 (1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2024.2331458

d’Orey, R., Carrega, J., Martins, A. da S., & Mendes, B. (2023). Dematerializing materials: Description of the first stages to digitize a museum exhibition with 3D technologies. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3623462.3623466

Heath, C., & Vom Lehn, D. (2010). Interactivity and collaboration: New forms of participation in museums, galleries, and science centres. In R. Parry (Ed.), Museums in a digital age (pp. 266–280). Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229432092

Insulander, E., & Selander, S. (2009). Designs for learning in museum contexts. Designs for Learning, 2 (2), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.21

Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034

Pierroux, P. (2024). Innovating visitor research within museums: Concepts, tools, and practices. Multimodality & Society, 5 (1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795241265256

Qing-Mei, Z. (2020). Design of micro-course as re-semiotization in technologically multimodal context. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 6 (2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLLL.2020.6.2.260

Steiner, M. A., & Crowley, K. (2013). The natural history museum: Taking on a learning agenda. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56 (2), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12024

van Leeuwen, T. (2022). Multimodality and identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186625

Wang, X., & Chen, X. (2023). Discourse, modes, media, and meaning in an era of pandemic: A multimodal discourse analysis approach. Social Semiotics, 33 (4), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2023.2265836

Wen, J., & Ma, B. (2024). Enhancing museum experience through deep learning and multimedia technology. Heliyon, 10, e32706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32706

Yan, L. (2024). Emerging technologies in digital museums: A literature review of educational application and evaluation methods. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 11, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.62051/c4vbr380

Downloads

Published

2025-06-04

How to Cite

BILIUK, J. (2025). MULTISENSORY EXHIBITING IN MODERN MUSEUM DISCOURSE (BASED ON NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUMS’ EXHIBITIONS IN LONDON, OXFORD, CAMBRIDGE). Linguistic and Conceptual Worldviews, 2(78), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2025.2.08

Similar Articles

1-10 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.